Welcome to P2PNET.net - The original daily p2p and digital news site. Always First!
Register | Login
RIAA News
Cool Stuff
MPAA News
Games / Consoles
News
Music
Movies
TV
Open Source
Mobiles
Advertising
Product News
P2P
Off Topic
Freedom
Politics
Interviews
Security
DRM
Links
Kids and Kartels
Search: 
Search
 
Web P2PNET   
Search: 
Search
Torrent Site Tracker
MP3rocket
 
Add real-time p2pnet headlines to YOUR site ! Click here to download our newsfeed code
p2pnet - rss feed: http://p2pnet.net/p2p.rss | p2pnet celebrities: http://p2pnet.net/celeb.rss | Mobile? http://p2pnet.net/index-wml.php

Big Music Canada fiasco

p2pnet.net News:- ” ‘Regardless of what people found in the early days of lawsuits,’ says Eric Garland, head of research firm BigChampagne LLC, which tracks Internet activity, ‘the consensus now is that file sharing is hitting all-time highs‘.”

That’s Garland quoted in Canada’s MacLeans.ca and he’s referring to the fact that claims from the Big Four music cartel notwithstanding, law suits aren’t doing much to stop people from around the world sharing files, including music and movies.

Garland should know. It’s his business to track what’s happening on the p2p networks and his statement is backed by academic studies both in the US and Canada which show p2p file sharing is here to stay, no matter how much the entertainment industry may exaggerate the success of its sue ‘em all lawsuits.

The subject under discussion in MacLeans is TV shows and how, “the scary numbers indicating that the next big craze in illegal file-sharing is not music, not movies, but television”.

Of course, there’s nothing particularly new about the fact that tv shows are on the p2p networks: they’ve been there almost since Day One. What’s more likely is: a segment of the entertainment industry is hauling out another excuse to justify its vain efforts to sue people into using ‘product’.

“News Corp.’s Peter Chernin cuts a confident figure at the podium, but he’s worried,” the MacLeans piece says, going on:

All the other rules are meaningless
“Speaking about the challenges facing media companies at a consumer forum two months ago, the COO of the Fox empire outlined his 10 rules for survival. Rule No. 1: consumers will always want to control how, where and when they get their entertainment, demanding maximum ease and convenience. But it’s the last rule that’s the clear crux of Chernin’s message: ‘All the other rules are meaningless,” he says, his voice growing more forceful, “if content is not protected from digital thievery’.”

Finally. At least one spokesman for a major component of the entertainment industry gets it:

Rule No. 1: consumers will always want to control how, where and when they get their entertainment, demanding maximum ease and convenience.

“All the other rules are meaningless …”

What’s really frightening Chernin and his ilk is: he’s 100% correct and thanks to the Net and p2p networks and applications, for the first time in history, consumers can control how, where and when. Because they’re no longer ‘consumers’ – mindless cells in a ‘thing’ whose sole purpose in the eyes of the entertainment industry is to ‘consume’ without question or thought whatever’s dished out.

File sharers are no longer ‘consumers’. They’ve become customers again – people who know what they want and how to get it.

The entertainment industry in the US, in the shape of the MPAA and RIAA, is doing its damndest to sue ‘consumers’ back into buying product instead of exercising choice and in this, they have the whole-hearted, enthusiastic support of the mainstream media who faithfully repeat just about everything the members of the Big Four music cartel and seven major studios churn out as if it comes from credible sources.

Not that they have much choice in many instances: they’re owned directly or indirectly by the entertainment industry they’re reporting on.

And now the Canadian media are following suit.

Bamboozle Canadians
Customers are consumers again – irresponsible beings who have to be shown what to do by the kindly members of the entertainment industry whose sole purpose is to serve, only to serve.

But in Canada, p2p file distribution isn’t illegal. In fact, as author and digital-copyright.ca webmaster Russell McOrmond points out, increasing numbers of musicians are specifically authorizing the distribution of their works over the p2p networks.

One such, he told p2pnet, is Toronto’s Fading Ways, one of the first labels with worldwide distribution to announce it would use Creative Commons licensing for its CDs.

This means the labels are no longer in total control, and it’s called ‘competition,’ a word loathed and feared by the record label cartel, none of whom are based in Canada.

And that’s why they’ve launched a major recovery effort in Canada with a dog-and-pony show featuring Canadian music stars they have under contract.

The idea is to use their weight and bottomless pockets to bamboozle Canadians, the Canadian media and Canadian lawmakers in the same way they’ve been able to scam Americans into thinking they’re being ruined by file sharing when in reality, they’re raking in enormous fortunes every day.

As McOrmond says, “Many media outlets just republish misinformation from the recording industry without doing any research.

“The most obvious example was the laughable suggestion that the copyright act hasn’t been updated since 1908 when the smallest amount of research would have confirmed it was updated earlier this year. And with a little more research, they’d have discovered that in 1997, there were massive changes made at the request of the recording industry, changes it now claims are hurting them.”

More or less verbatim
Canada is in an interesting situation.

Compared to America, it has a small population and no true national media pool – that’s to say, a large number of major media organs with widely varying perspectives and political persuasions in competition with each other to supply the news.

So if the entertainment industry can succeed in getting its message more or less verbatim into the Globe & Mail, the various Sun publications, The Toronto Star, Canadian Press, national magazines such as Macleans and the handful of similar ‘national’ publications, as it seems to be doing, it’s way ahead of the game - even more so than in the US.

Like all politicians, Canada’s representatives of the people will head where there’s the most noise. And Big Music is making a lot of noise, and all from Big Music’s standpoint.

Musicians demand Ottawa protect them from music piracy, say 14 different Google News headlines from publications across Canada, all parroting the same Canadian Press story.

Musicians call for an update on copyright law, say two more stories, with Musicians want protection from piracy as one more headline.

And that’s it.

The coin only has one side.

In fact, the musicians haven’t really demanded anything. The cartel-owned CRIA (Canadian Recording Industry Association of America) is behind the massive PR exercise, having provided the musicians with its own self-serving and completely one-sided statistics with which to con the media and, through them, bring Canadian politicians into line - Big Music’s line.

The men, women and children who share files online and who’ve been turned into virtual criminals by the Big Music cartel (none with a Canadian base) and major studios aren’t the Bad Guys.

The real villains are the organized international gangs who are making fortunes through fake and counterfeit product, laughing all the way as they run rings around the entertaimenrt industry and its enforcement organizations such as the CRIA, RIAA, MPAA, etc.

There’s a remedy. The counterfeit criminals would be largely out of business without the physical product the labels, studios and software makers churn out in their billions so they can be duped and copied.

The industry could use digital technologies and p2p networks to store, promote and sell their already digitized outpourings. That would cut back on overhead, slash physical production, and packaging and other costs, not to mention the vast amounts of money being spent on ‘enforcement’ and other efforts such as the Parliament Hill promo fiasco.

In other words, p2p file sharers could become customers again and p2p file sharing could work for, instead of against, the industry and its contracted artists.

Musicians demand Ottawa protect them from music piracy?

That should read, Canadians demand Ottawa protect them from Big Music.

Jon Newton

===================

See:-
all-time highs - Hot television, Macleans, November 29, 2004
dog-and-pony - Big Music lobbies Cdn parliament, p2pnet, November 25, 2004

HOME

9 Responses to “Big Music Canada fiasco”

  1. Reader's Write Says:

    You say that the press cannot get their stories right. What about you? How many times must you be told that it is not CRIA (Canadian Recording Industry Association of America) but CRIA (Canadian Recording Industry Association).

    There is NO “America” in the title.

  2. Reader's Write Says:

    Actually he’s probably quite right

  3. Reader's Write Says:

    You’re new here, aren’t you?

    It’s an ongoing joke. It suggests the CRIA takes direction from the RIAA. Like a lot of Canadian organizations, it’s just a branch plant for their American masters.

  4. Reader's Write Says:

    Well written article, but questions still remain.
    Customer/consumer basically means paid for/stolen. Sorry. Don’t get me wrong….I feel I have the right to download every single one of the songs that I have on LP. I ain’t paying anymore for that right.

    You seem to think that there is a better ‘business model’ out there? What would that be?
    They have the same old sites at 99 cents a song, and that’s 99 cents more than what they started with.
    How can the record industry become one with P2P?
    It will never happen.
    P2P is ‘us versus them’, and always will be.
    Imagine a silly scenerio…..
    Kazaa hooks up with the RIAA…once free, now ya gotta have a credit card. People will say ‘whatever’ and move on.
    Downloading music is something that I feel I have a right to do. I already own the right to listen, as I have about 1000 LP’s!
    Some of those albums I have re-purchased the rights too, by buying the cd version. But I already owned those rights!
    So….I feel no sympathy for the record companies. If they had a ‘bring in your LP’ and ‘trade it for a cd’ deal…ha ha ha
    Why not? I own the right to listen to the damn thing!
    But Suzy down the street pays as much as me.
    Suzy doesn’t have it on LP. Why does she ‘own’ it when she buys the cd, but I don’t ‘own’ it ’cause I have the LP?

  5. Reader's Write Says:

    “Compared to America, it has a small population and no true national media pool – that’s to say, a large number of major media organs with widely varying perspectives and political persuasions in competition with each other to supply the news.”

    The US media might on the surface seem diverse, but underneath there are a small number of mega-conglomerates that control virtually all of the mainstream market - and their viewpoints tend to fall in lock-step with each other. Any whose viewpoints fight the current will tend to be pushed back into line by threats of special-interest or corporate advertising boycotts, or being shut off from access to government officials.

    That’s one reason why I read the foreign press for all political news about the USA. There are many truths that the mainstream US media dares not ever mention.

  6. Reader's Write Says:

    “Like a lot of Canadian organizations, it’s just a branch plant for their American masters.”

    Pfffft.. hilarious how little power you yourself have, yet you speak of some American omnipotence..

    Some crappy joke on a rinky dink fringe website does not make the CRIA the RIAA’s bitch..

    It just so happens that stealing music is NOT a long-term solution that anyone can live with… and makes sense that the CRIA would act the way it does.

    I await further Canadian organizations that desperately look South for.. pffft.. guidance.

  7. Reader's Write Says:

    Every Canadian’s dream is to become and American. Jealousy is an ugly thing…

  8. Reader's Write Says:

    Jealousy is an ugly thing, but delusional is worse.

    As a Canadian (not the one who replied earlier), I can attest that most of Canadians consider it an insult to be called American.

  9. Reader's Write Says:

Leave a Reply

    Advertisments
Teksavvy